Category
Interview/Assessment
Availability
HQ
Manchester, United Kingdom
Pricing
Custom
Free tier
No
Best for
Also in
Capabilities
What is Arctic Shores?
Arctic Shores is a psychometric assessment platform that evaluates candidates through interactive, game-based tasks rather than traditional questionnaires, assessing cognitive ability, behavior, and role fit while generating a candidate experience that's genuinely engaging rather than a chore. Its assessments are validated to predict job success and reduce turnover, and results map to your specific role criteria rather than generic personality archetypes. Your team configures and runs assessments directly; Effi Flo's role is connecting Arctic Shores into your ATS so results flow automatically into candidate records.
What are Arctic Shores's key features?
Screen candidates on how they think, not how they write: Game-based tasks measure cognitive ability, learning agility, risk tolerance, and emotional resilience through behavior during interactive play - giving your team signal that a polished CV or a coached interview answer can't replicate.
Triage large inbound pools before anyone reads a resume: Game results integrate with your ATS and surface top-scoring candidates automatically, so your recruiters enter the interview stage with a ranked shortlist rather than a manual review of every application.
Reduce bias in the first screening pass: Because assessments measure behavioral traits rather than education or employment history, candidates from non-traditional backgrounds get evaluated on actual potential - not on whether their CV reads like a shortlistable template.
Candidates complete assessments on any device, on their own schedule: Mobile-compatible tasks take 25-35 minutes and require no downloads, keeping completion rates high even for early-careers and volume hiring campaigns where drop-off is a real cost.
Connects to your ATS with pre-built interview guides included: Effi Flo integrates Arctic Shores with your existing applicant tracking system, and role-specific interview guides built from game data land automatically with hiring managers so the next stage starts with context, not a blank slate.
How do recruiting teams use Arctic Shores?
- A scaling company's TA team uses Arctic Shores' neuroscience-based gamified assessments to evaluate candidates' cognitive ability and behavioral traits without relying on resumes, which are increasingly unreliable in an AI-generated content environment.
- An enterprise TA team hiring for graduate or early-career programs uses Arctic Shores to assess potential across a large applicant volume in a format candidates actually complete, reducing drop-off compared to traditional psychometric tests.
- An in-house TA leader uses Arctic Shores' SmartRecruiters integration to trigger assessments automatically at the right pipeline stage, so results land in the ATS candidate record without a manual export step.
Who is Arctic Shores best for?
- In-house TA teams where CVs alone are no longer a reliable screen and traditional psychometric questions have become easy for candidates to game with AI
- Organizations that need a legally defensible, bias-aware assessment with strong completion rates - Arctic Shores' task-based format consistently outperforms text-based tools on candidate experience
- Teams at PwC, AstraZeneca, or similar enterprise employers screening at volume where cognitive and personality insight needs to scale without adding interviewer hours
What are Arctic Shores's pros and cons?
Pros
- Interactive task format cannot be completed by ChatGPT or similar generative AI tools, unlike text-based psychometrics
- Captures breadth and depth of candidate insight through 12,000 data points per assessment, providing more holistic view than traditional tests
- Science-backed methodology combines neuroscience and psychology to score how candidates think and learn, not just what they know
- Integrates with ATS and provides pre-built interview guides, reducing setup and comparison time for hiring teams
Cons
- Pricing not publicly listed - requires contacting the company for a quote, making budget planning unclear
- Task-based format requires more candidate engagement time than simple questionnaires, potentially affecting completion for some applicant pools
- Specific compliance certifications and data residency options not detailed in available sources
How does Arctic Shores compare to alternatives?
| Feature | Arctic Shores | Bryq | Byteboard | CodeSignal | HackerRank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Interview/Assessment | Interview/Assessment | Interview/Assessment | Interview/Assessment | Interview/Assessment |
| AI-first | |||||
| API | |||||
| MCP | |||||
| GDPR | |||||
| Best for | Agency, In-House | Agency, In-House | Agency, In-House | Agency, In-House | Agency, In-House |
Swipe right to see more →
Frequently asked questions about Arctic Shores
Other Interview/Assessment tools
12 toolsReady to Fill Your Pipeline?
Book a free 30-minute strategy call. We'll map your current stack, identify the biggest opportunity, and show you exactly how AI can accelerate your pipeline.
30-minute call · No obligation · Custom strategy for your niche