Category
Interview/Assessment
Rating
4.9/5 (14 Reviews)
Availability
HQ
Unknown
Pricing
From $159/mo
Free tier
Yes
Best for
Capabilities
What is CodeSubmit?
CodeSubmit is software the hiring team operates, built around asynchronous take-home projects plus a live pair-coding session. Candidates clone an assignment into a real Git repository, work locally in their own editor with their own tooling, and push the result back, so the employer receives a reviewable commit history rather than a session recording. The team's own engineers review that submission, with AI review first flagging structure, testing gaps and follow-up questions to focus their time. It sits at the take-home stage, after an initial screen and before the final round.
What are CodeSubmit's key features?
Candidates clone a real repository and work locally in their own editor and terminal.
The employer gets a commit history and diff to review, not a snapshot or a recording.
Short tasks screen candidates quickly before a full take-home is worth sending.
AI review summarises structure, testing gaps and follow-up questions for the reviewer.
A live follow-up session runs inside the submitted repo so candidates explain their choices.
How do recruiting teams use CodeSubmit?
- Spot who can solve a realistic problem before spending recruiter time on a longer conversation
- Let a candidate build in their own environment, using the tools they would use on the job
- Review a diff with the gaps already flagged, then decide whether a live session is worth booking
- Send the assignment from the ATS at the assessment stage and post the result back to the profile
Who is CodeSubmit best for?
- I want candidates working in their own editor on a real task, not puzzles in a browser
- In-house engineering teams from startup scale through to larger organisations
- Teams combining an early screen, a take-home project and a live pair-coding session
What are CodeSubmit's pros and cons?
Pros
- Candidates clone a real Git repo and submit a pull request, producing genuine commit history.
- Take-home challenges, live pair sessions and short screens are included in every paid plan.
- ATS integrations with Greenhouse, Lever and Ashby are included without a separate fee.
- Flat-rate pricing is published openly, with no per-candidate charge at any tier.
Cons
- API access and ATS integrations are not available on the entry plan, limiting automation.
- Candidate credits are capped monthly and do not roll over, so busy periods exhaust them.
- SSO beyond Google and Microsoft is a paid annual add-on on every plan.
What are people saying about CodeSubmit?
CodeSubmit holds 4.9/5 across 14 G2 reviews. Reviewers highlight "Great product for running programming assessments". Others note "Easy and fast to use, super helpful with hiring technical staff". One common thread: "Great Platform that Really Improved Our Hiring Process".
Consolidated from 14 reviews across G2 · Updated May 17, 2026
How does CodeSubmit compare to alternatives?
| Feature | CodeSubmit | Arctic Shores | Bryq | CodeSignal | HackerRank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Interview/Assessment | Interview/Assessment | Interview/Assessment | Interview/Assessment | Interview/Assessment |
| AI-first | |||||
| API | |||||
| MCP | |||||
| GDPR | |||||
| Best for | Agency, In-House | Agency, In-House | Agency, In-House | Agency, In-House | Agency, In-House |
Swipe right to see more →
Frequently asked questions about CodeSubmit
Other Interview/Assessment tools
12 toolsReady to Fill Your Pipeline?
Book a free 30-minute strategy call. We'll map your current stack, identify the biggest opportunity, and show you exactly how AI can accelerate your pipeline.
30-minute call · No obligation · Custom strategy for your niche